|
keys and scoped keys
#conref
Hi all, I’m trying to figure out a use case for scoped keys. After reading this very helpfull article (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/56472/Understanding%20Scoped%20Keys%20In%20DIT
Hi all, I’m trying to figure out a use case for scoped keys. After reading this very helpfull article (https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/56472/Understanding%20Scoped%20Keys%20In%20DIT
|
By
Wim Hooghwinkel
· #43567
·
|
|
keys and scoped keys
#conref
If you have: + keys=”key1” {blue} ++ keyscope=”scope1” +++ keys=”key1” {red} Then the resolved value of a reference to key “key1” will be “blue” in all contexts because the highest declaration wins. T
If you have: + keys=”key1” {blue} ++ keyscope=”scope1” +++ keys=”key1” {red} Then the resolved value of a reference to key “key1” will be “blue” in all contexts because the highest declaration wins. T
|
By
ekimber@contrext.com
· #43568
·
|
|
conkeyref to <steps>
#conref
#FrameMaker
Hi list, I can't create a conkey reference to the <steps> element. When I try to save, the following error message appears: Error at file .../xxx.dita.B85, line 12, char 133, Message: Expected an elem
Hi list, I can't create a conkey reference to the <steps> element. When I try to save, the following error message appears: Error at file .../xxx.dita.B85, line 12, char 133, Message: Expected an elem
|
By
Frank Dissinger
· #44858
·
|
|
conkeyref to <steps>
#conref
#FrameMaker
In the referencing topic have you defined the <steps> element to include the required <step> element? You need one. You do not need more. The actual number of steps will be determined by the content y
In the referencing topic have you defined the <steps> element to include the required <step> element? You need one. You do not need more. The actual number of steps will be determined by the content y
|
By
Lief Erickson
· #44860
·
|
|
conkeyref to <steps>
#conref
#FrameMaker
Hi Frank, The content model for <steps> requires at least one <step>, and the content model for <step> requires at least one <cmd>. This true even when using @conref or @conkeyref. Try this: <steps co
Hi Frank, The content model for <steps> requires at least one <step>, and the content model for <step> requires at least one <cmd>. This true even when using @conref or @conkeyref. Try this: <steps co
|
By
Bob Thomas
· #44861
·
|
|
conkeyref to <steps>
#conref
#FrameMaker
Hi Bob, Thank you for your reply. I wasn't aware of this restriction. Seems illogical... I entered the code you suggested (had to switch to XML View): <steps conkeyref="key/id"> <step><cmd/></step> </
Hi Bob, Thank you for your reply. I wasn't aware of this restriction. Seems illogical... I entered the code you suggested (had to switch to XML View): <steps conkeyref="key/id"> <step><cmd/></step> </
|
By
Frank Dissinger
· #44865
·
|
|
Why use conref instead of conkeyref?
#conref
Being new to DITA, I am trying to understand cases where conref should be used instead of conkeyref. As far as I can tell, conkeyref can do anything conref can do with the added benefit of indirect ad
Being new to DITA, I am trying to understand cases where conref should be used instead of conkeyref. As far as I can tell, conkeyref can do anything conref can do with the added benefit of indirect ad
|
By
Jonathan Hanna
· #44875
·
|
|
Why use conref instead of conkeyref?
#conref
Hi, You should use a conref where the language does not need to vary per publication. For example, if your legal department approves a set of caution and warnings that should not change. If you use co
Hi, You should use a conref where the language does not need to vary per publication. For example, if your legal department approves a set of caution and warnings that should not change. If you use co
|
By
Mica Semrick
· #44877
·
|
|
Why use conref instead of conkeyref?
#conref
I tend to use conref for cases where reuse is internal to a single topic, where the overhead of seeing up a key is really not needed. I use the this topic structure to implement. That said, I can coun
I tend to use conref for cases where reuse is internal to a single topic, where the overhead of seeing up a key is really not needed. I use the this topic structure to implement. That said, I can coun
|
By
Julio J Vazquez
· #44878
·
|
|
MathML: Reusing parts of an equation
#conref
#MathML
Hi group I have multiple similar equations in my DITA topics where only one or two values are different, so I would like to reuse the identical parts. Is there a way to do this (if necessary with a pl
Hi group I have multiple similar equations in my DITA topics where only one or two values are different, so I would like to reuse the identical parts. Is there a way to do this (if necessary with a pl
|
By
Yves Barbion
· #45005
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Hi all, We have a help system with 2000+ topics. We're moving to a static site generator (Hugo), and I'm wondering about converting all of our xrefs into conkeyrefs. We have to re-architect our folder
Hi all, We have a help system with 2000+ topics. We're moving to a static site generator (Hugo), and I'm wondering about converting all of our xrefs into conkeyrefs. We have to re-architect our folder
|
By
Marsh, Ed
· #45099
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Hi Ed, I don't understand, do you want to convert indirect links (keyrefs) to content references (conkeyrefs)? Can you give maybe an example with how the DITA content would look like before and after
Hi Ed, I don't understand, do you want to convert indirect links (keyrefs) to content references (conkeyrefs)? Can you give maybe an example with how the DITA content would look like before and after
|
By
Radu Coravu
· #45102
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Thanks, Radu. I want to convert direct links to indirect links using keyrefs. I'll try out your scripts today! Ed.
Thanks, Radu. I want to convert direct links to indirect links using keyrefs. I'll try out your scripts today! Ed.
|
By
Marsh, Ed
· #45106
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Hi Ed, I posted a similar question awhile back: https://groups.io/g/dita-users/topic/48674191#44715 We are relatively new to DITA. Our writers have been adding cross-book links to their content (which
Hi Ed, I posted a similar question awhile back: https://groups.io/g/dita-users/topic/48674191#44715 We are relatively new to DITA. Our writers have been adding cross-book links to their content (which
|
By
Chris Papademetrious
· #45115
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Thanks, Chris, this is exactly the discussion I'm looking for (though I wasn't quite looking for it then!). We're moving from a bespoke DITA-to-Confluence system to a static site generator (Hugo). We
Thanks, Chris, this is exactly the discussion I'm looking for (though I wasn't quite looking for it then!). We're moving from a bespoke DITA-to-Confluence system to a static site generator (Hugo). We
|
By
Marsh, Ed
· #45129
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
If you can manage it, replacing all references from topics to other things (so conrefs, cross references, etc.) to use keys is the best way to go. Within maps it may or may not make sense to use keys,
If you can manage it, replacing all references from topics to other things (so conrefs, cross references, etc.) to use keys is the best way to go. Within maps it may or may not make sense to use keys,
|
By
ekimber@contrext.com
· #45130
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Hi Eliot, I was studying your first link yesterday :) Will check out the remainder tonight. Ed.
Hi Eliot, I was studying your first link yesterday :) Will check out the remainder tonight. Ed.
|
By
Marsh, Ed
· #45135
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Feel free to ask questions here. An older paper I presented on key best practices suggests that you should always have resource-only topicrefs for your topics and then use those from the navigation to
Feel free to ask questions here. An older paper I presented on key best practices suggests that you should always have resource-only topicrefs for your topics and then use those from the navigation to
|
By
ekimber@contrext.com
· #45136
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Thanks, Eliot. We're moving to a static site generator (Hugo) where the folder/file structure determines the structure of the site. Because all of our links are currently xrefs, I thought this would b
Thanks, Eliot. We're moving to a static site generator (Hugo) where the folder/file structure determines the structure of the site. Because all of our links are currently xrefs, I thought this would b
|
By
Marsh, Ed
· #45155
·
|
|
Keyref/conkey ref conversion strategy - keyref all the things?
#conref
Hi Ed, all, Our writers use nested <topic> elements in some topic files to keep tightly-related content together. One pain point with "keyref-all-the-things" is that subtopics nested within topic file
Hi Ed, all, Our writers use nested <topic> elements in some topic files to keep tightly-related content together. One pain point with "keyref-all-the-things" is that subtopics nested within topic file
|
By
Chris Papademetrious
· #45162
·
|