Re: specialization and lightweight DITA #specialization
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Please DO NOT move from your DITA to Lightweight DITA, as it is not going to make your content better. Although specialisation can be done from Lightweight DITA to re-introduce the elements you need, I would strongly recommend applying constraints on your DITA - allowing you to pick exactly what you need from DITA and effectively hide the rest from the authoring experience.
Using constraints means that all DITA processing tools will still work without any hiccups. If you start making specialisations that have any impact on the rendering at all, you will have to create those rendering parts for the Lightweight DITA tool chain. Constraints do NOT make your DITA incompatible with anything. I often wonder why companies shy away from this mechanism, as it is the only tool you normally need to tailor your DITA vocabulary to your authoring needs.
I have personally created a DITA constraints tool for FrameMaker that allows defining constraints without ever seeing an angular bracket. This is available in the FrameMaker 2019 product (i.e. no extra purchase or download - it is part of the product as Adobe has paid for the development). If you are using <oXygen> it is quite easy to edit the RelaxNG files that are the base for DITA since version 1.3. All my GUI for FrameMaker does is allowing non-geeks to edit those RelaxNG files in a safe manner.
I hope this helps you avoiding a path to lots of disasters.
Smart Information Design
Cell: +31 646 854 996
On 23 Jun 2020, 09:50 +0200, annet.wezenbeek@..., wrote:
Trying to understand if we can move from full DITA to lightweight DITA. It seems very simplified and that would mean getting rid of some elements that worked really well. Is it possible to create a specialization in lightweight DITA that uses some of the elements from full DITA?